Buffer strips to protect the Venice Lagoon
from non point source pollution
From: Proceeding of the International conference on buffer zones, their processes and potential in water protection
Heythrop (UK), august-september 1996
by Daniel Franco, Marino Perelli & Mario Scattolin

Agricultural cropped fields were recognised as an important source of nitrogen pollution affecting the Venice Lagoon ecosystem. Till the sixties the agricultural management of this area was characterised by a large diffusion of hedgerow system and vegetated strips. Most of them were pulled out in the last decades to create a "modern" agricultural cropping system.

 Venetian Municipality is developing several actions to control lagoon pollution, including the planting of windbreaks and hedgerows. These are reintroduced by means of particular landscape planning model, accounting for the needing of local agriculture (Franco et al., 1995b, 1996).

 There was a lack of knowledge about the effect of the buffer strips in pollution control in Northern Italy environment (Franco et al., 1995a). To assess the non-point source pollution functionality in the planning system, a filed test was established.

 This test was a part of a more complex experimentation on non-point pollution in the area of Venice Lagoon (Perelli et al., 1993), including control of manure utilisation and the implementation of the "Dafne® 1" approach to animal manure utilisation (Perelli and Franco, 1994a, 1994b).
 
 

Methods

Grain corn (Zea mais L.) was grown in 1995 and in 1996 on a calcareous clay-loam soil. A multistoried one-line shelterbelt was planted on half length of the border line of a field, using plant material suitable for producing effective results in the first years of the project (e.g. 2-3 m trees, 1.5 m shrubs).

 The hedgerow was realised with several experimental structure scheme using local species selected for their high capacity to control nutrients leaching:

The nutrient losses were monitored by means of piezometric wells and traps for run off. Sampling was made every ten days for groundwater and after every runoff event for the traps. For a better understanding of the data exposed in the figures of this paper, the nitrite nitrogen (which was lower then 1,5% of N-NO3) was included in the nitric nitrogen

 Fertilization was made with mineral fertiliser (urea, mono-ammonium phosphate and potassium muriate), compared with liquid animal manure, both to supply 300 kg/ha of nitrogen, 120 kg/ ha of phosphorus (P2O5) and 120 kg/ ha of potassium (K2O)
 
 

Results

After two years, we can have a first look of results considering mean values. More detailed consideration will be possible after more years. The abatements of waterground nutrients are reported in figure 1.
Nutrient abetement
Figure 1. Nutrient abetement

The control (with an efficiency of about 50%) was very effective for nitrate, the most dangerous pollutant in water quality assessment. The control of ammonium and organic nitrogen was less effective, but we have to consider that these compounds are less mobile in the soil and generally less dangerous for water quality.

 The mean control efficiency of total nitrogen was higher than 30% and this may be considered a good result. Phosphorus control was less effective (16.1%), but its content in water was very low (Table 1). Pollutant control was very strong for runoff: the hedgerow stops more than 85% of solids, and consequently there is a good control of total phosphorus (Table 2).
 
 

Table 1. Water table quality. Mean: December 1994 - July 1996

No hedgerow Hedgerow
N-NH4 mg/l 0.231 0.160
N-NO2 mg/l 0.029 0.033
N-NO3 mg/l 3.042 1.556
Organic N mg/l 1.668 1.639
Total N mg/l 4.946 3.288
Total P mg/l 0.596 0.501
Table 2. Cumulative runoff. January 1995 - June 1996
No hedgerow Hedgerow
Water  mm  29.69  11.05 
Solids  kg/ha  4501.90  550.00 
N-NH4  g/ha  492.12  227.18 
N-NO2  g/ha  31.59  14.27 
N-NO3  g/ha  260.50  50.71 
Organic N  g/ha  1584.90  292.40 
Total N  g/ha  2319.85  581.21 
Soluble P  g/ha  51.708  23.65 
Total P  g/ha  9481.87  2325.24 
For the same reason there is an abatement of organic nitrogen higher than in the groundwater, and consequently a very good control of total nitrogen runoff. Really all nitrogen compounds are more controlled than in the water table.

 The good abatement of runoff is probably due to a very rapid growing of a permanent vegetated bank above the multistoried one-line shelterbelt. The minor control of buffer strips, instead, is probably linked to the reduced activity in the first year after planting. For a quicker effect in pollutant abatement, in this experiment older plant material, which suffers of heavier planting stress, was used instead of seedlings.
 
 

Seasonal variation of abetement
Figure 2. Seasonal variation of abetement

As show in figure 3, in fact, the control efficiency of all groundwater pollutants is increasing with the hedgerow taking roots: this is more clear taking in account plant growing season, which in Mediterranean climate is reduced during all winter and in full summer.

Effect on cumulative runoff
Figure 3. Effect on cumulative runoff

Especially nitrogen and N-NH4 have a contrasting seasonal evolution, and phosphorous seems to have slower evolution trend than N-NO3. These behaviours are probably linked to the soil and rizosphere biological activity, as it will be possible to state in further experiment phases.
 
 

References


Back to:

The Virtual Agronomist Home Page

Marino Perelli's publications



URL of this page: http://www.arvan.it/perelli/hedg.htm
Last updated on 26 October, 2007
© 1996-2007 Marino Perelli. Mira (Venice), Italy. All Rights Reserved